Video Course: Automated UI Testing in C#

This is the Automated UI Testing in C# video course created by me. It is the continuation of series of courses dedicated to step-by-step UI automation framework development. Just click on the image below for more details.

NBehave vs SpecFlow Comparison

It's always good when you use some technology and you have a choice between various tools/engines. In some cases it makes a problem like it happens sometimes with BDD Engines especially when we have to choose between similar engines which are widely used and at first glance they seem to be identical. Some time ago I've made JBehave vs Cucumber-JVM comparison to spot some differences and comparative characteristics of the most evolved engines in Java world. And as I can see from the pge views statistics it's quite interesting topic. At the same there is .NET technology which has another set of BDD engines. And they are quite popular as well. So, in this world we may encounter question like: What is better, NBehave or SpecFlow ?

This answer isn't so trivial. When I did cross-platform BDD Engines comparison almost 3 years ago some of the engines weren't well enough or at least their documentation was on low level. At that time NBehave didn't seem to look well. But since that time a lot of things changed and now both NBehave and SpecFlow are turned into full-featured Gherkin interpreter engines. So, the choice of better tool among then isn't so trivial anymore. It means we'll start new comparison between NBehave or SpecFlow

So, let's find out who's winner in this battle!!!

Sirius C#: adding UI Automation library

Recently we've created code interacting with Win32 and Web. Now it's time to expand the coverage to the .NET area. For this purpose we have dedicated library called UI Automation. This library is provided with .NET framework and contains basic API interacting with window objects. At the same time this library can be used for interaction with the standard Win32 controls, however it can be used as an auxiliary modules to expand the coverage of existing library I created before for interacting with Win32 elements. In this article I will create sample control classes and make some demo showing how it works. Also, in this example I'll take the tab control and create simple tests interacting with it. At this point that would be just stand-alone library but in the future it will be integrated into entire Sirius project.

Sirius: Adding code style checks

We already set up the build process for Sirius as well as we reserved the placeholders for testing. So, further improvement in this area is to extend build with different tests and checkpoints which make more detail verification. This time we'll add more modules which perform static testing for our components and they should fail the build if static checks didn't pass (especially taking into account that it was initially planned).

What would we look for? Basically that's:

• Conformity to coding standards - all code standards are made to provide unified approach of writing code as well as reading and maintaining it.
• Various cases of improper code usage - a lot of actual application errors are results of improper code use or use of potentially dangerous code constructions. So, the earlier we find them the less number of silly mistakes we take during further testing stages

Actually, we've made first approximation for that while we checked the compilation ability. If system isn't compilable it's not working at all. So, we're just making more detailed checks.

Since Sirius modules use different programming languages the tool set will be varying based on that. We'll use the following tool set for that:

Language	Engine
Java	Check Style PMD
C#	StyleCop
Ruby	rubocop

OK. Let's see how it would be added.